My list

Methodology

Shortlist is built on a simple invariant: every fact you see should be traceable to a source, dated, and labeled with a confidence class. Every score should be able to explain its inputs.

Source priority

  1. Official federal datasets (IPEDS, College Scorecard, NSF HERD, Clery).
  2. Official institution-published pages and PDFs.
  3. State higher-ed agencies and accreditors.
  4. Public local/geospatial datasets for amenities and context.
  5. Editorial review by the Shortlist team where structured sources do not cover a question.
  6. User-submitted corrections, reviewed by the team before they affect public facts.

Advertiser-supplied claims are kept in a separate ledger and never enter the organic fact graph until they are independently verified.

Confidence classes

Fit ranking

Fit ranking is deterministic: the same inputs always produce the same output, including the explanation. We score five dimensions — academic, financial, practical, outcomes, and cultural — and combine them with the user's weights.

We deliberately do not publish a single master rank. Fit is multidimensional, and any single number obscures tradeoffs that families need to see.

SEO and content quality

Public pages are indexable only when they meet a coverage and uniqueness threshold. Thin or stale pages carry a noindex directive automatically until enough source-backed data is present.

Privacy and minors

We do not allow self-serve accounts for users under 13 until verifiable parental consent is implemented. Sensitive preferences (identity, support needs, finances) are optional, excluded from advertising, and stored with stricter access controls. See the privacy notice for details.

Corrections

Anyone can report a problem with any fact or page. Corrections enter a queue, are reviewed by an editor, and resolved with an audit trail. Institutions cannot suppress unfavorable factual data.